Category: VANCOUVER

  • The Aftermath of April 26 – Healing will take time, thoughtfulness, and intention.

    The Aftermath of April 26 – Healing will take time, thoughtfulness, and intention.

    CONTENT WARNING Talking about the event that unfolded after the Lapu Lapu Festival on April 26, when a deranged motorist murdered at least eleven people with his SUV.

    It had been a little over two weeks since I had been at the site of the Lapu Lapu Festival, in and around the South Hill neighbourhood and John Oliver High School. Today was a beautiful warm sunny day, just like it was on the day of the Lapu Lapu Festival.

    The Festival, a celebration of Filipino pride, culture, and resilience, had taken place on a beautiful sunny day spanning several streets and parking lots. Music, laughter, dancing, happy crowds, and food created a buoyant, lively atmosphere for blocks. I had too much fun, ate too much street food, but did manage to line dance with some lolas and introduce my colleagues Sean and Lucy to my favourite sweet snack, turon. I had left the festivities that afternoon for another event, only to return later that night on news that mass casualty event had taken place.

    The trauma of that evening came in many forms. Of course, first and foremost the immediate victims, the survivors, and the first-hand witnesses – by the time I had arrived blue and red and white lights were strobing every surface, the last ambulances were leaving, firefighters with faces dulled in shellshock, police were taping off the streets, one was crying. A baby, a small child had been killed. I was crying. Ashen-faced volunteers marshalling amidst sequestered city buses to triage witnesses . Emergency rooms are overwhelmed at all regional hospitals. Our city and the world recoiled in horror and sadness.

    How do we collectively recover, how do we individually recover? Two weeks later I’m here walking with survivors from that night, neighbours living within a block of the site at East 43rd between St George and Fraser where Kai-Ji Adam Lo deliberately drove his car into a crowd of people. We are walking slowly, the mom’s leg is in a brace from where the SUV struck her. She was separated from her son when they were hit, he was thrown and concussed. The dad shared his terror running from home to the scene to find his family. They all survived.

    We walked along the block of 43rd past rows of stacks of flowers, flags, candles, teddy bears and toys, framed photos, wooden hearts, Filipino flags, mylar balloons. Markers dangle on strings attached to plywood sheets festooned with messages of hope, of sympathy, of love, of grief, of shock, of resilience. A deep growling muscle car roars by and we all flinch nervously.

    The folks that live here, the thousands of young people who attend John Oliver, the local business community. Inevitably, once the flowers have wilted and the and the rains have smeared the cards into inky streaks, when the memorial has been packed up, we will need to reconcile this physical space in a meaningful way.

  • REVEALED Mayor’s Plan to freeze new supportive housing in Vancouver

    REVEALED Mayor’s Plan to freeze new supportive housing in Vancouver

    Last month, Ken Sim told the “Save Our Streets” group he’d propose freezing new supportive housing in Vancouver. Residents we’ve spoken to are concerned about the ABC party undermining non-profits and punishing the vulnerable. Their motion dropped today.

    Sim’s motion, up for debate on February 25, has been revealed. Its new title, “Temporarily Pausing Net-New Supportive Housing Investments,” is less harsh, but still harms vulnerable populations by denying any new supportive housing to meet growing needs.

    Read full text of motion:
    https://council.vancouver.ca/20250226/documents/pspcmotion3.pdf

    The softening of mayor Sim’s motion is a response to the public’s strong backlash to freezing all supportive housing across the board, and shows his backroom machine may be listening, yet still it punches down on some of society’s most vulnerable: the homeless.

    Supportive housing is subsidized housing with on-site supports for adults, seniors and people with disabilities at risk of or experiencing homelessness. Sim’s revised motion will freeze City contributions of land or funds specifically for homelessness response supportive housing.

    Sim’s less-bellicose, revised motion includes exemptions for health and recovery, women and families, seniors, and youth ageing out of care. Curiously, there’s also an exemption that allows for (net-new) density added to replacement supportive housing sites.

    Nonetheless, ABC’s message is quite clear they would like the homeless problem to go away – and by that either to future as-yet-unfunded replacement housing, or preferably to another city. Beyond the callousness of that intention with regard to our fellow humans – there are four big problems.

    First, back when the City of Vancouver regularly conducted homeless counts, data showed most street homeless were once permanently housed here before circumstances found them unhoused; not by choice, and not coming from elsewhere as often suggested.

    Secondly, despite purported intent of public safety and quelling street disorder, the absence of housing with support for folks at risk of homelessness will only exacerbate the desperation and chaos for unhoused folks in an increasingly hostile city. I don’t believe this will help public safety.

    Thirdly, we are collectively entering a time of profound economic uncertainty and housing precarity – things aren’t getting better for a lot of Vancouverites and many are “one paycheque away.” Rather than saying no, we should be looking to make supportive housing better.

    Lastly, injunctions to evict encampments (Strathcona, Oppenheimer, CRAB) were inevitably overturned because courts (under Charter Sec. 7) ruled homeless campers had nowhere else to go. In past we could call on Province to do their part, but now we have abdicated our role? Seems fraught with issues.

    Let Sim and ABC know unhoused Vancouverites matter too. We want public safety and decent housing for everyone. We can and should do better, but as other cities in the region are taking Ken’s cue to cancel supportive housing, this bad policy will only hasten worse outcomes.

  • Buy Canada or Bye Canada

    Buy Canada or Bye Canada

    Most Canadians are still reeling from the apparent betrayal by our supposed closest allies, as President Trump threatens punitive tariffs as a prelude to his not-really-joking aspiration to make Canada a 51st state.

    I’ve spent a sleepless night on the eve of the Lunar New Year, fretting about what this means for our homeland. I put together a draft motion in the hopes that we can activate a logical and practical City response to these tariffs: Buy Canadian, prepare our strategies, analyze our exposure and opportunities, cut the red tape and prepare for nimble response and we anticipate supply chain disruptions and needs for businesses to pivot or die.

    While we have seen a thirty day “reprieve” (until Trump decides otherwise) I hope my colleagues will support the, I’ve run it by Rebecca Bligh who has been very supportive but might not reflect the typical ABC mindset. Hopefully we can put partisan politics aside and GO CANADA .

    Draft Motion (title TBD)

    WHEREAS

    1. President Donald Trump has threatened to impose unilateral 25% tariffs on Canadian exports to the US, and further punitive tariffs in the event of any Canadian retaliation, Trump’s tariffs are anticipated to destabilize the North American trading block and Canadian economy;
    2. Experts suggest Trump’s tariffs could cost the Canadian economy $275 billion in GDP by 2030 and more than 200,000 in lost jobs;
    3. On February 2, while proposing a temporary pause to his tariff agenda, President Trump reiterated his desire to see Canada become part of the United States. “‘What I’d like to see— Canada become our 51st state,’ Trump said in the Oval Office when asked what concessions Canada could offer to stave off tariffs.”; [1]
    4. Prime Minister Trudeau has announced the federal government’s response to any Trump tarrifs with phased and targeted retaliatory tariffs, and a consumer call to action urging Canadians to “choose Canada”;
    5. Provincial, territorial, municipal, regional, and First Nations governments from coast to coast are united in a collective Team Canada approach to respond to US economic threats and aggression;
    6. Canada’s premiers have agreed to measures to strengthen internal trade and economic cooperation, and in BC, Premier Eby has suggested Crown Corporations halt buying American goods and services and instead buy Canadian goods and services first;
    7. In response to tariff threats the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade (GVBOT) has challenged B.C. politicians of all political stripes to adopt a three-per-cent annual GDP growth target; and
    8. The benefits of buying local are well documented, according to Canadian Federation of Independent Businesses (CFIB), 66 cents on average stay local for every dollar spent at a local business as the greatest share goes to procuring goods from other local, independent businesses, while according to the Independent BC report local businesses return 63% of revenue back in BC’s economy compared to 14% for multi-national companies, and according to the City’s own Retail-Commercial District Small Business Study, local independent businesses contribute to more vibrant Local Shopping Areas and play an important role in the livability and sustainability of the City’s neighbourhoods.

    THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED

    1. THAT Council affirms and signals the City of Vancouver supports the Team Canada approach to align local, provincial, and national priorities as necessary to counter foreign policies designed to harm the Canadian economy or sovereignty.
    2. THAT Council directs staff to initiate an urgent high-level review of capital projects, suppliers, procurement, and trade agreement exposure and opportunities to Buy Local / Buy Canadian and report back as soon as possible with immediate and long-term strategies supporting the Team Canada approach.
    3. THAT Council directs the City’s Business and Economy Office to immediately begin work with local business and community economic development organizations (including but not limited to the BIA Partnership, LOCO BC, GVBOT, CFIB, Destination Vancouver) to explore opportunities to initiate and promote a new targeted Buy Local / Buy Canadian campaign in response to tariffs;FURTHER THAT the office is tasked to identify and report back with recommendations for streamlined, transparent and nimble City regulation for changes of use, and adaptation of business models to respond to tariffs, supply chain disruption, and GDP growth targets.

    [1] TheHill.com, February 3 | Trump doubles down on floating Canada as 51st state amid tariff dispute

  • Election finance fairness

    Election finance fairness

    Today, council approved framework for a by-election to replace council seats vacated by Adriane Carr and Christine Boyle. Elections (and by-elections) are a cornerstone of our democratic process of course, but one party has not being playing by the same rules as the rest of us. So political rivals from Greens, COPE, OneCity and TEAM came together to highlight the fact that ABC still have not accurately completed their mandatory Elections BC financial reporting and as a result have benefited from unlawful contributions to their political advantage.

    The following is excerpted from our collective media release

    Pending an April by-election, COPE, TEAM, OneCity, and the Greens collectively call on BC’s election watchdog for accountability while Sim’s ABC party remains under investigation for potentially breaching campaign finance rules in the 2022 election

    Vancouver, BC, January 21, 2025 – United in respect of and adherence to British Columbia’s Local Elections Campaign Financing Act (LECFA), four rival political parties are sharing concerns that Elections BC still has not completed its investigation into financial misconduct from ABC’s campaign in the 2022 municipal election.

    The four parties – The Green Party of Vancouver, OneCity Vancouver, TEAM for a Livable Vancouver, and the Coalition of Progressive Electors (COPE) – wrote to Elections BC late in 2024 with concerns that the election watchdog has yet to take the necessary and reasonable steps of holding political parties accountable to the standard required by the Local Elections Campaign Financing Act (LECFA).

    In January 2024, it was publicly reported that ABC Vancouver had repaid $116,000 of prohibited contributions to its donors in the 2022 municipal election campaign. On April 11, 2024, Elections BC stated that it was investigating ABC for possible contraventions during the 2022 election campaign. To date, no further action against ABC has been publicly announced, and no administrative or monetary penalties related to the 2022 civic election have been posted on the Elections BC website.

    In view of the upcoming Vancouver municipal by-election, the four opposition parties believe it is incumbent on Elections BC to complete its investigation and apply any penalties, disqualification, or deregistration it deems is warranted, recognizing the substantial advantages that ABC had over other parties in that election by having the use of thousands of dollars in contributions during the campaign that it later refunded to supporters – more than a year later – the benefits of which may have significantly affected the voting outcome.

    The four opposition parties all strictly observed BC’s campaign finance rules during the 2022 municipal election, and expect Sim’s ABC to be held to the same standard. 

    Today, Council approved a by-election for two new Vancouver City Councillors to take place on April 5.

    “Fair and democratic elections rely on transparency and accountability. Yet, two years after the general election, ABC has issued multiple amended disclosures and remains under investigation for campaign finance irregularities. Vancouverites deserve assurance that rules and regulations are applied fairly and promptly to all individuals seeking their vote and the responsibility of holding political office,” said Pete Fry, elected City Councillor with the Green Party of Vancouver.

  • I’m putting the blog back together

    I’m putting the blog back together

    To be clear I was always a lousy blogger. While I do like to write, I lack the conviction to put it into a long form written piece when — let’s face it– a cheeky tweetstorm or snappy comeback on Facebook is so much easier and has a much more extended reach.

    But then the unholy alliance of Trump and Musk began to fester and percolate, and emboldened racists, bigots, homophobes, misogynists, knuckle draggers, and MAGAts began to usurp the newly unfettered digital commons, as the tech bro oligarchs genuflected before the new orange emperor.

    After a particularly ugly racist post that elicited the ire of some anonymous Vancouver-based racist who suggested I was (paraphrasing) ethnically a monkey and the only good monkey was a dead monkey accompanied by a video of a black man being shot to death, and threatened one of my colleagues with homophobic violence – I though I might move on from Musk’s Twitter bastard spawn.

    So I moved on to Bluesky for the most part, which is nice but seems less effective for reach so far. Before I did move on I was treated to a charmingly on-brand post from the northern MAGAt mean girl President of John Rustad’s BC Conservative Party suggesting violent racist and homophobic threats from a self-described white nationalist was part of the normal scrutiny that comes with public service

    I accidentally opened a portal to a right wing MAGA hellscape when I posted my disdain for X and bluesky preference highlighting recent homophobic racist posts to me and a colleague. The President of the BC Conservative Party tried to normalize violent threats from a white nationalist as "scrutiny"

    [image or embed]

    — Pete Fry (@ptfry.bsky.social) November 29, 2024 at 3:24 PM

    So, in any event – I think for 2025 I am going to make an effort to tweet less and blog more