Category: VANCOUVER

  • NPA votes against tax on property flippers

    NPA votes against tax on property flippers

    Vancouver City Council proposes province tax property flippers… But NPA voted against.

    ICYMI, as the BC Budget was being delivered, the rest of Vancouver City Council passed Adriane Carr’s “Call for Bold Provincial Actions to Tackle Housing Affordability.”

    The motion to address impacts of global capital, speculators & property flipping reflects a long standing intent of both the Vancouver and BC Greens to address some of the more egregious forces effecting housing demand and affordability.
    The original motion is here: http://council.vancouver.ca/20180220/documents/motionb3.pdf

    Specifically the entire NPA council caucus voted against items:
    a.) restrictions on foreign purchases, and
    c.) taxing flippers.
    You can watch the debate and final amendments to the motion online starting around 04:50:00. http://civic.neulion.com/cityofvancouver/index.php?clipid=3495786,000

    Postscript: Posted in response to: https://globalnews.ca/news/4040242/vancouver-city-council-passes-motion-…

  • UBCM Housing Strategy for BC

    UBCM Housing Strategy for BC

    Union of BC Municipalities have released a housing strategy for BC that consolidates some excellent recommendations:

    – more rental housing
    – demand management
    – comprehensive homeless strategy
    – all government collaboration
    – manage prices through targeted tax+regulatory change

    Read the full UBCM Policy Document
    A Home For Everyone: A Housing Strategy for British Columbians

  • Over six months later, negligent developers still screwing over local neighbours.

    Over six months later, negligent developers still screwing over local neighbours.

    Word that the developers of the Brixton Flats project in Chinatown are refusing to fairly compensate residents of the half dozen homes they destroyed back in in April, when a wind storm collapsed a brick retaining wall they had been constructing (ironically covering over the very mural they have featured in their promo for the new development).

    I know at least one of the tenants is getting some pro-bono legal support. Not sure if Lee Benevolent Association are also getting stiffed by the Vancouver-Victoria Development Corporation GMC Projects. Apparently GMC have taken the slippery route and have lawyered up to avoid paying out.

    GMC should not receive occupancy permits for their new development until fair compensation and damages have been paid to the displaced neighbours — this situation is entirely unacceptable.

    Link to original story from April 8:
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/6-people-displaced-after-…

    Link to developers:
    http://www.gmcprojects.com/brixton-flats/

    Postscript: 

    Follow-up #1 on local residents still displaced by a “luxury flats” development, when a wall collapsed and rendered the two neighbouring properties uninhabitable. The city has since followed up, but no word on how they will force these developers to take accountability or prevent this sort of thing from happening in the future.

    Thanks to the Sun’s Dan Fumano for digging in and daylighting this!
    http://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/dan-fumano-developer-fights-comp…

    Follow-up #2 Happy follow up to share!
    Lesley – displaced by neighbouring construction negligence has housing secured in new Community Land Trust Housing. It’s a small victory in the battle for local housing and there’s still follow up work to do and ensure the city holds the negligent builders accountable before issuing an occupancy permit. But today, YAY!

    http://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/dan-fumano-for-pensioner-whose-h…

  • Penalties for Illegal Ridesharing Operations should be Steeper

    Penalties for Illegal Ridesharing Operations should be Steeper

    While MLAs continue to debate how to regulate ride shares in Vancouver and across BC — here in the Lower Mainland, growth in illegal rideshares has been absolutely explosive!

    Yesterday on CKNW I followed up with Lynda Steel on a conversation we had back in July. Then, the illegal unregulated rideshare GoKabu was boasting 150,000 rides since they began operations in June 2016. Today that total is 1,000,000. One million unregulated, unlicensed, uninsured and untaxed rides — and that’s just one company!

    GoKabu are but one of at least seven illegal and unregulated rideshares operating in the Greater Vancouver area. They significantly undercut the taxi industry drivers who are paying insurance and taxes, and following requirements for licensing and permits (at significant cost).

    Regardless of your opinion on pros or cons of rideshare: both Uber and Lyft are at least respecting our legal process, and lobbying government to change the laws and introduce a new regulatory framework. Taxi drivers are similarly lobbying to even the playing field. These unregulated operators prefer to ignore the law,and game the system.

    So far fines that have been levied against ridesharing scofflaws have been shrugged off as “the cost of doing business”. Yesterday both BC Green leader Andrew Weaver and I suggested the same thing: if fines aren’t working, up the ante and impound the vehicle.

    Under Section 104.1 of the Motor Vehicle Act, a peace officer can impound the vehicle of an uninsured driver (any vehicle carrying commercial passengers must have a Class 4). Similar statues exist under the MVA for uninsured drivers (ICBC don’t cover commercial passengers under personal insurance policies).

    hear full interview: https://omny.fm/shows/steele-drex/penalties-for-illegal-ridesharing-oper…

  • Green politico Pete Fry sounds alarm about loophole in campaign-finance law

    Green politico Pete Fry sounds alarm about loophole in campaign-finance law

    Big money may continue to influence local elections in B.C., says a former city-council candidate. Pete Fry of the Green Party of Vancouver claims that this is due to a loophole in legislation that was passed by the province last month regarding campaign financing.

    “That opens the opportunity for kind of an end run around getting a lot of that big money out,” Fry told the Straight in a phone interview.

    He explained that although the new law banned corporate and union donations and imposed limits on individual contributions, people with deep pockets may still sway electoral outcomes.

    According to Fry, the wealthy can affect the polls either by acting as or acting through third-party-advertising sponsors. These are individuals or groups that conduct election advertising independent of elector organizations and individuals.

    “A developer group could register as a third-party election sponsor and deliver messaging,” he cited by way of an example.

    The two-time council candidate noted that there is neither a limit on how many contributions can be made to these third-party advertisers nor a cap on how much they can spend in the election period, which begins in the calendar year in which an election is held.

    “I can see that being a real opportunity to reinsert big money into the political process despite this legislation,” Fry said.

    He pointed out that the only time the law imposes an expense limit on third-party-advertising sponsors is during the campaign period, which is the 28 days preceding the vote.

    Residents of B.C. who are either Canadian citizens or permanent residents can contribute to these advertising sponsors. They can give as much as they want, which is not the case when they are making a donation to elector organizations and candidates.

    Under Bill 15—or the Local Elections Campaign Financing Amendment Act, 2017—which passed on November 23 this year, individuals may contribute only up to $1,200 to an elector organization and candidates in a campaign.

    Follow Carlito Pablo on Twitter at @carlitopablo.
    https://www.straight.com/news/1009891/green-politico-pete-fry-sounds-ala…