Tag: Archive

  • Adriane Carr: Vancouver and I need Pete Fry on city council

    Adriane Carr: Vancouver and I need Pete Fry on city council

    I love my job as a Vancouver city councillor. But I’d get a lot more done and the city would be better off if Pete Fry were to join me at the council table.

    Dynamics were different at city hall when I was elected as Vancouver’s first Green councillor in 2011. The two NPA councillors—Affleck and Ball—were willing to second my motions even if they didn’t vote for them, just to ensure they got publicly debated. Vision councillors, who often tried to dissuade me from even making motions, occassionally seconded one, then basically quashed it by referring it to staff for review.

    Things changed after the 2014 election when Vision’s majority was reduced by one, the NPA gained a councillor, and I topped the polls and my running mates, Pete Fry and Cleta Brown, came close to winning. Council is more hyperpartisan and rancorous, although I stay out of the fray. Both Vision and the NPA are increasingly reluctant to second my motions unless I accept their changes, which often means watering down my original intent. Sometimes no one will second my motion. And many are still referred by Vision to staff, meaning there’s no debate or vote on what I’ve proposed. That includes my motion to change our city bylaws to define housing affordability in terms of local peoples’ incomes, not market rents.

    Why is this important? Because it’s through motions that I table new ideas and solutions to city problems, many of which come from residents themselves. Those ideas, especially concerning our housing and homelessness crisis, deserve debate and consideration. Goodness knows, the thinking and big-developer biases that have dominated council for the last 10 years haven’t solved our problems.

    Vancouver needs a more balanced council, focused on protecting public interest, not on scoring partisan points.

    Vancouver and I need Pete Fry elected to council on Saturday (October 14).

    I first met Pete Fry in his role as spokesperson for the Strathcona Residents’ Association, fighting a dangerous proposal to dramatically increase commuter traffic through their neighbourhood as part of the viaducts removal. That proposal got dropped. I admired his dedication to community and asked Pete to run with me for council in 2014.

    Pete is impressive and effective. He’s active on community boards and planning committees. He’s passionate about people’s quality of life, both in his neighbourhood and Vancouver as a whole. He is articulate and deeply knowledgeable about city issues, providing me with valuable information and answering matter of factly when grilled by councillors every time he speaks at city hall—on issues ranging from the impact of short term rentals on affordable long-term rental housing to small business concerns and community economic development to planning and transportation issues.

    Pete is a people-person, just as easily connecting with Downtown Eastsiders as with the well-to-do; with homeowners as with renters; with policy wonks as with punk rockers. Pete listens to people’s ideas and concerns around city decisions. He searches out new solutions, travelling to Portland and Seattle, for example, to check out the unique Dignity Village for homeless people and meet with planners about how they genuinely involve the public in city decision-making through neighbourhood councils.

    Pete is practical. Although lobbying for senior government support is important, he’s focused on finding the ideas that Vancouver itself can act on to solve our escalating housing affordability and homelessness crisis.

    Here’s Pete’s five-point quick-action plan on housing:

    1. Change city bylaws to make affordable mean affordable: based on local incomes, not market rates.

    2. Call for a one-year moratorium on demolition of purpose-built rental housing, and strengthen the tenant relocation and protection guidelines.

    3. Protect and increase secondary and basement suites by making it easy to legalize them.

    4. Launch a citywide plan to involve citizens in deciding how to add density, affordability, and “missing middle” housing into their neighbourhoods.

    5. Create a Renter’s Office at the City, to better protect and resource the over half of Vancouverites who rent their homes.

    Elect Pete and he’ll hit the ground running to move on these actions and more. He knows the ropes at city hall. We’ll work together on motions, and get double the time I now have to ask questions and debate. (Each councillor gets only five minutes.) He’ll change the dynamics at the council table. He’ll join me in putting public interest first.

    There’s a mood for change in our city. Pete’s been leading in the polls. I hope voters turn out in droves on Saturday (October 14) to vote Green and elect Pete Fry.

    I need Pete Fry on City Council. More importantly, Vancouver does.

    Adriane Carr is Vancouver’s only Green party city councillor.

  • Video: I’ll fight to protect our communities, homes and jobs

    I’m running to be your city councillor, because when I talk to Vancouverites, they tell me they are frustrated – they feel like the city is failing them. Failing them on housing. Failing them on homelessness. People feel that there’s special treatment for a special group of developers; that too many decisions get made behind closed doors. Public trust is broken.

    I got my start advocating for our communities here in the East End, but I’m running to be a City Councillor for all Vancouver: from the Punjabi Market to the West End, from Dunbar to the Drive, from South Hill to Southlands — as your City Councillor, I’ll put public interest first.

  • One-bedroom apartment listings in Vancouver now firmly stand at $2,000 a month

    One-bedroom apartment listings in Vancouver now firmly stand at $2,000 a month

    “The biggest issue is what, as a city, we can do for renters,” said Pete Fry…

    “When I say, ‘increase supply’, I know it immediately triggers that Vision Vancouver, NPA kind-of rhetoric,” he said. Fry clarified he’s not arguing in favour of a blank cheque for condo developers to build anything they want.

    “What we need to do is actually slow the kind of supply that we don’t need and really incentivising the kind of supply that we do need,” he explained. “That is a power that we have at the city level, through the approval and rejection of discretionary rezonings and that sort of thing.”

    Read full article: https://www.straight.com/news/977871/one-bedroom-apartment-listings-vanc…

  • Video: A New Fair Deal on Housing, and Five Quick Start Actions to Help Us Get There

    I released a new video today, describing our Green Party goal for a new deal on housing, and announcing five bold quick start actions the City could immediately pursue to ease Vancouver’s housing crisis. We need to shift development in Vancouver. As a city, we must ensure that we are building more housing that’s affordable for local people instead of for the luxury market and speculators.


    Ultimately this means using the city’s power over land use decisions to prioritize purpose-built rental on City and public lands that is truly affordable to local incomes; and on private lands increasing the amount of developer cost levies and contributions to support affordable housing or extracting publicly owned housing outright. 

    But while other parties continue to call for solutions that ultimately require the support of senior government to change tenancy laws, property taxation or invest in public housing. We’ll advocate to senior government for those kinds of actions, but we need to get started right here and right now in our city with things we can actually do. These Five quick start actions the city can do immediately will help get us there and address the urgency of our housing crisis: 

    1. Change city by-laws to make affordable mean affordable: fixing housing prices to local incomes, not market rates.

    Adriane Carr put forward a motion to fix the City’s definition of “affordable housing” to local incomes, but to get it seconded it was weakened to only require only a staff report, not the actual change. With another Green on City Council, we can second this motion and introduce it for public debate under its original intent.

    2. Call for a one-year moratorium on demolition of purpose-built rental housing, and strengthen the Tenant Relocation and Protection Guidelines.

    During the moratorium the city will work on a plan to both retain and restore older affordable apartment buildings as well as build and maintain new purpose-built rental through funding that Greens have been pushing for including re-instating federal tax incentives and creating a new Vancouver Carbon Trust. Update the Tenant Relocation and Protection by-law to ensure landlords aren’t using loopholes to renovict and displace tenants and that residential tenancies are protected city-wide. 


    3. Protect and increase secondary and basement suites by making it easy to legalize them.

    Protect neighbourhoods and affordability while giving new life to old buildings. Secondary and basement suites make up some of Vancouver’s most affordable rental housing. Amend the Secondary Suite Program to encourage secondary suites as incentives for retaining character homes, as opposed to multi-conversion dwelling process typically done by developers under the current framework.

    4. Launch a city-wide plan to involve citizens in deciding how to add density, affordability and “missing middle” housing into their neighbourhoods.


    Planning by spot rezoning and density bonusing instead of a city-wide plan has driven speculation and skyrocketing increases in land prices. Why is Vision so opposed to a city-wide plan? Working collaboratively with communities and neighbours to create a city-wide plan is the only process by which residents can come together on decisions that affect growth, housing and affordability city-wide and in their own neighbourhood. 


    5. Create a Renter’s Office at the City, to better protect and resource the over half Vancouverites who rent their homes.

    Immediately create a department that can provide resources and support for the renters of Vancouver: to provide help with provincial tenancy laws, to ensure homes are safe and landlords adhere to our Standards of Maintenance bylaw, to stop bogus renovictions and to ensure renter’s rights are protected in an increasingly tight and exploitive market.

    Postscript: 

    I’m running to be the Green Party’s second City Councillor. I need your vote, to elect me to join Green Party City Councillor Adriane Carr in this October 14th by-election. Another Green would significantly broaden the ability to introduce and debate new policies, whereas today Carr must rely on conditional support of other parties’ councillors to second her motions, which often involves watering down the motion.

  • Thoughts on mayor’s bid to lure Amazon HQ2 to Vancouver

    Thoughts on mayor’s bid to lure Amazon HQ2 to Vancouver

    Let this sink in.

    While so many of Vancouver’s bricks-and-mortar small businesses are struggling to stay afloat, our mayor is trying to woo a multinational corporation whose business model is based on replacing local bricks-and-mortar shops. 

    While that’s sinking in, consider this:

    The proposed second headquarters for the monopoly seeking online retail behemoth would take up about 8 million square feet and employ about 50,000 high paying jobs. 

     Vancouver doesn’t have nearly that number of job seeking white collar tech workers, so those 50,000 tech jobs will represent a significant population influx. Set against the failure to meaningfully address urgent local issues like homelessness, housing un-affordability, low vacancy rates, and struggling retail districts; it’s hard to imagine what (if any) plan the mayor has to counter the impact of Amazon HQ2. 

    The scale of the project, and rumours to locate it on the False Creek Flats, or on land extracted from the Agricultural Land Reserve will be a monumental “game changer” [2] for our city.  

    But like any game changer, there are winners and losers: given the state of Vancouver, it’s not hard to imagine who the losers will be. 

    “Amazon’s rise has not been without local critics, who say the influx of mostly well-heeled tech workers has caused housing prices to skyrocket, clogged the streets with traffic and changed the city for the worse…” [1] 

    While it is laudable for our city and the Vancouver Economic Commission to attempt to lure new business and investment to the region (project has a $5b pricetag and promises significant indirect economic activity), it’s worth taking a closer look at what Amazon represents. 

    In a 2015 paper, Civic Economics: “Amazon and Empty Storefronts” [3] studied the impacts of Amazon’s online retail on the U.S. market: in that year, Amazon sold $55.6 billion of retail goods nationwide, resulting in a net loss of 222,000 retail jobs, depriving an equivalent of $528 million in otherwise bricks-and-mortar storefront property taxes, and avoiding $704 million in sales tax. Amazon has even patented autonomous drone technology with plans to deliver products directly from its warehouse to your home. 

    In Seattle, Amazon’s premiere HQ is described as the harbinger of that city’s record growth: “Amazon has been blamed or praised — depending on your perspective — for Seattle’s historic real estate boom.” 

    Contrast the Amazon model and its impacts with current situation for local bricks and mortar stores: struggling under skyrocketing land values and taxes, unable to retain employees increasingly priced out of living in the city, financially squeezed customers and shrinking disposable income. 

    Vancouver: we need to get our own house in order before we start inviting new guests. 

    [1] http://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/toronto-among-the-cities-vying-to-become-second-amazon-home-in-north-america 

    [2] https://www.biv.com/article/2017/9/could-vancouver-become-amazons-second-home/ 

    [3] http://www.civiceconomics.com/empty-storefronts.html 

    [4] http://www.seattletimes.com/business/real-estate/could-amazons-hq-bombshell-let-the-air-out-of-seattles-housing-and-development-boom/

    Postscript: 

    Since I posted this on Facebook, there was considerable interest and some comment suggesting I was against well paying jobs. Let me be perfectly clear, I support the creation and attraction of good well paying jobs. The mayor’s office has also since done a 180˚ suggesting the bid for Amazon would now be a regional one, not the City of Vancouver going it alone. While the greater metro region is a far more reasonable consideration to support a 100 acre site and 50,000 high paid employees, there is still a great deal of scrutiny and long range planning to consider in a project of this scale, including what kind of deals and concessions we may be offering to lure the Amazon HQ2.

    An interesting article on that last consideration can be found here https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2017/09/08/amazons-red-herring/ and here https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/technology/amazon-headquarters-north-america.html?mcubz=1&_r=0.

    Given the mayor’s track record so far on dealing with housing, homelessness and protecting small local businesses, and history of backroom deals and developer campaign donations — I remain cynical about how this particular project would be handled.